Custodied BTC · Ethereum

Wrapped BTC WBTC

An Ethereum token representing BTC held in custody. Its backing and redemption depend on the custodian and merchant network.

In use on-chain· 8 open positionsAssessment temporarily unavailable

Sample protocol snapshot. These figures are not the current protocol state.

Assessment overview

The assessment could not be loaded. Available protocol data is shown below.

Risk data & lending terms

Lending terms

Effective annual interest

1.25% – 1.88%

Current rate, adjusted for retained reserve

Retained reserve

20.0%

Current share of gross minted debt

Global minting limit

9.0M ZCHF

Across all originals · 56.2% used

Effective interest = (base rate + contract premium) ÷ (1 − retained reserve). Rates vary; average 1.55%, weighted by debt outside the reserve.

Positions & price exposure

Price exposure

0 ZCHF (0.00% of this asset's debt) is within 10% of its configured liquidation price at the last observed market price.

The last price observation is 1580 hours old; this asset's monitoring window is 1 hours. Price-based figures describe that earlier observation.

Collateral value / debt

181%

reference-priced collateral ÷ debt across the considered positions

Nearest price cushion

37.5%

reference-price distance to the highest configured liquidation price · median 42.2%

Debt within 10% of its liquidation price

0 ZCHF

within 5 %: 0 · within 20 %: 0

Positions considered

8

active, with debt, at 64.0k CHF / WBTC

Debt by price cushion

  • ≤ 0%–
  • 0 – 5 %–
  • 5 – 10 %–
  • 10 – 20 %–
  • 20 – 40 %1.4M
  • > 40 %3.7M
Positions nearest their liquidation price
PositionPrice cushionDebt ZCHFWBTCLiq. priceState
0x0C80da…882223v2 · clone37.5%1.4M35.0040'000open
0x422050…9D70e6v2 · clone40.6%3.8k0.100038'000open
0x8E2Dc1…9E2cf8v2 · original42.2%1.3M36.0037'000open
0xfB2146…D66ec1v2 · clone42.2%74.0k2.000037'000open
0x4dF874…a1D840v2 · clone42.2%3.7k0.100037'000open

Cushion = reference-price distance to the configured liquidation price. Reference price: 64'015 CHF. Showing 5 of 8; the full list is in the Positions block.

What if the price falls?

Explore debt at or beyond its configured liquidation price. Positions and parameters stay unchanged. This estimates threshold exposure, not liquidation proceeds or losses; comparisons assume 1 ZCHF = 1 CHF.

Starting price: 64'015 CHF / WBTC, observed 07 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC. This scenario uses an unverified or outdated reference price.

Compare price scenarios
Price dropReference CHF priceDebt beyond thresholdShare of asset debtPositions
0%64'0150 ZCHF0.00%0
10%57'6140 ZCHF0.00%0
20%51'2120 ZCHF0.00%0
40%38'4091.4M ZCHF27.65%1

Positions

PositionOwnerWBTCMinted ZCHFColl. ratioLiq. priceEffective interestReserveAuctionExpires
0x0C80da…882223v2 · clone0x963e…b30135.001.4M160%40'0001.25%20%24 h04 Sept 2027
0x8E2Dc1…9E2cf8v2 · original0x963e…b30136.001.3M173%37'0001.88%20%2 d09 Nov 2027
0x194E0d…879F4ev2 · original0x963e…b30140.301.2M215%34'0001.25%20%24 h04 Jun 2028
0xc7DEe3…53eF19v2 · clone0xE346…D34129.851.0M183%35'0001.88%20%2 d09 Nov 2027
0xfB2146…D66ec1v2 · clone0xDc82…11cf2.000074.0k173%37'0001.88%20%2 d09 Nov 2027
0xc37511…043635v2 · clone0x3777…B1E00.13794.8k183%35'0001.88%20%2 d09 Nov 2027
0x422050…9D70e6v2 · clone0x9291…2B760.10003.8k169%38'0001.88%20%2 d26 Apr 2027
0x4dF874…a1D840v2 · clone0xA448…6Ea20.10003.7k173%37'0001.88%20%2 d09 Nov 2027
41 closed or denied positions
0x84eDBA…dC758Cv1 · clone0x7e24…B53F0.00000–40'0003.33%10%24 h15 Apr 2025
0x9532A1…243662v1 · clone0x7e24…B53F0.00000–40'0002.50%20%24 h29 Jan 2025
0x14eC23…319A92v1 · clone0xf980…f5260.00000–40'0002.50%20%24 h29 Jan 2025
0xfC22a3…7538A7v1 · original0xbfE1…494e0.00000–30'0003.33%10%24 h15 Jul 2028
0xF465aD…9100C3v1 · original0xbfE1…494e0.00000–30'0002.22%10%24 h25 Jul 2026
0x95eA1b…6Ee75Ev1 · clone0xDccf…c24c0.00000–30'0002.22%10%24 h31 Aug 2024
0x4c400C…e79F67v1 · clone0xdEa2…27Ee0.00000–30'0002.22%10%24 h25 Mar 2026
0x53b42a…7bD877v1 · clone0xdEa2…27Ee0.00000–30'0002.22%10%24 h25 Mar 2026
0x99EF4d…Fe486ev1 · clone0xDc82…11cf0.00000–30'0002.22%10%24 h25 Mar 2026
0x030eE6…2D771dv1 · clone0xdEa2…27Ee0.00000–30'0002.22%10%24 h25 Mar 2026
0x5eD895…7E66a4v1 · clone0xdEa2…27Ee0.00000–0.0000002.22%10%24 h25 Mar 2026
0x98CE3e…492f96v1 · clone0xDc82…11cf0.00000–30'0002.22%10%24 h25 Mar 2026
0x98725e…241EF3v1 · original0x963e…b3010.00000–40'0002.22%10%24 h25 Mar 2026
0x220aaf…99A47Fv1 · clone0x5F7b…913c0.00000–36'0002.50%20%24 h29 Jan 2025
0x13753e…22E590v1 · clone0xC01c…FdcA0.00000–37'3202.50%20%24 h29 Jan 2025
0x9FB558…eD29B6v1 · clone0xdEa2…27Ee0.00000–36'0002.50%20%24 h29 Jan 2025
0xe4255F…854e97v1 · clone0x963e…b3010.00000–30'0002.50%20%24 h27 Jan 2025
0xe394e7…30645bv1 · clone0x2D89…45610.00000–40'0002.50%20%24 h29 Jan 2025
0xDa3c50…9c1c87v1 · clone0x9aaD…BBcC0.00000–30'0002.50%20%24 h29 Jan 2025
0xD0a865…dF019Fv1 · original0x93F9…f6A70.00000–70'0002.50%20%24 h29 Jan 2025
0xB010cc…92CF4Cv2 · clone0x5b61…F1C00.00000–37'0001.88%20%2 d31 Dec 2026
0xfE8163…2CE59bv2 · clone0x963e…b3010.00000–40'0001.25%20%24 h30 Jun 2026
0xB51c80…6ef4D0v2 · original0x963e…b3010.00000–40'0001.25%20%24 h04 Sept 2027
0xeE8333…9f96Aav2 · clone0x078a…45FD0.00000–75'0001.75%20%24 h13 Dec 2025
0x0A4137…8Fb600v2 · clone0xa9bA…96040.00000–75'0001.75%20%24 h13 Dec 2025
0x7c9E13…b4B9b1v2 · clone0x5275…f3a20.00000–75'0001.75%20%24 h30 Sept 2025
0x090599…0cb26fv2 · clone0x963e…b3010.00000–50'0001.75%20%24 h13 Dec 2025
0x9f5c9C…c9c9CCv2 · clone0x77fA…2f710.00000–75'0001.75%20%24 h30 Jun 2025
0x5A1f17…71DDF4v2 · clone0x83bD…2b4D0.00000–75'0001.75%20%24 h30 Jun 2025
0x063Cb8…F6234Fv2 · clone0xf980…f5260.00000–50'0001.75%20%24 h01 Apr 2025
0x64e72F…e5530Cv2 · clone0x8E3F…03030.00000–50'0001.75%20%24 h01 Apr 2025
0xf629b2…DFD465v2 · clone0x8E3F…03030.00000–65'0001.75%20%24 h08 Mar 2025
0xe45FCc…45Ae1cv2 · clone0x437e…571E0.00000–65'0001.75%20%24 h07 Mar 2025
0xE15081…BB5982v2 · clone0xf980…f5260.00000–65'0001.75%20%24 h07 Mar 2025
0xedb5E7…e4A078v2 · clone0xa9bA…96040.00000–65'0001.75%20%24 h01 Oct 2025
0xF725f1…a6C9Edv2 · clone0x437e…571E0.00000–75'0001.75%20%24 h31 Jan 2025
0xABA90C…3bABafv2 · clone0x437e…571E0.00000–75'0001.75%20%24 h31 Jan 2025
0x1FFA43…45032bv2 · clone0x437e…571E0.00000–65'0001.75%20%24 h31 Jan 2025
0x7C4aCe…31AC19v2 · clone0xdEa2…27Ee0.00000–49'0001.75%20%24 h13 Dec 2025
0x192E98…6703A0v2 · clone0x8E3F…03030.00000–75'0001.75%20%24 h31 Jan 2025
0xB4A71e…546709v2 · original0x963e…b3010.00000–50'0001.75%20%24 h13 Dec 2025

Effective interest includes the reserve adjustment. Collateral ratio = collateral value at the current price ÷ minted. Open a position on app.frankencoin.com ↗.

Challenges & liquidations

StartedPositionChallengerSize (WBTC)FilledLiq. priceBidsStatus
17 Nov 2025, 19:35 UTC0x0a4137…8fb6000x963e…b3010.2000100%75'0001Success
17 Nov 2025, 19:01 UTC0xee8333…9f96aa0x0000…babb0.1150100%75'0001Success
17 Nov 2025, 00:27 UTC0xee8333…9f96aa0x0000…babb0.1150100%75'0001Success
09 Apr 2025, 12:31 UTC0xedb5e7…e4a0780x963e…b3010.2000100%65'0001Success

Most recent 25. Full history on app.frankencoin.com ↗.

Changes & sources

Token contract0x2260fac5…3bc2c599Etherscan ↗

Governance reference: not linked. A discussion link and a published assessment do not by themselves verify an adopted parameter set.

All protocol parameters

Reference market price

64'015 CHF

$79'059

Minted ZCHF

5.1M

debt against this collateral

Remaining aggregate limit

3.9M

of 9.0M ZCHF total limit

Estimated collateral value

9.2M CHF

143.49 WBTC locked

Open positions

8

8 total · 2 original / 6 clones

Debt / collateral value

55.3%

debt ÷ reference-priced collateral

Contract risk premium (V2)

0.24%

positions range 0.00% – 0.50%

Annual fee rate on gross debt

1.24%

= base rate + contract premium, before reserve adjustment

Challenges

0

active · 4 total

Source: protocol aggregate (api.frankencoin.com/ecosystem/collateral/stats) · price via defillama (07 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC)

Community discussion
Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC)

#17 · Acceptable Collaterals · opened 27 Jan 2024 by luziusmeisser · 2 comments · ▲ 3 · matched by title

Reply on GitHub
Original post (show)

We should support Wrapped Bitcoin as a collateral.

What are the right parameters for a position with a three year horizon?

CHF interest stands at 1.75%, and the yield curve for three year mortgages stands at 2.02%, so let's start with 2%.

On top of that, we need to add a risk premium that depends on the volatility of the underlying asset, the reserve ratio, and the auction duration. These three define the expected outcome in case the market price P touches the liquidation price LIQ in the following chart:

image

Let's assume the auction duration is two days, with each of the two phases being 1 day. This gives the position owner (and the market) one day to react in case the position is being challenged. This should be enough given the liquidity of WBTC even if there are only very few system participants. Currently, Bitcoin's annualized volatility stands at 56%. This translates into a two-day volatility of 0.56*sqrt(2/365)=4.1% or an hourly volatiliy of 0.6%. Given these parameters, we are interested in the expected outcome of successful challenges. So the question is: given that the price touched the liquidation price and a challenge was started, what is the expected profit or loss for the system?

Plugging the above numbers into a Monte Carlo simulation, it looks like we can expect successful auctions to and at a price of around 96% of the liquidation price. This means that already with a buffer of 10%, the expected liquidation will be slightly profitable. To be on the safe side (considering that returns are not normally distributed in practice), let's set the buffer at 20%, yielding an average profit of 14% of the liquidation price (after deducting 2% challenger reward). This means that we do not need to add a risk premium at all at average with a buffer as generous as 20%. Even when simulating with historical data, we find that a 10% buffer is enough to make liquidations profitable most of the time:

image
(Chart from the Frankencoin thesis.)

With a buffer of 20%, the minter gets 80%, so when setting the interest to 2%, the effective interest is 2%/80%=2.5%, which should be a reasonably attractive rate. What do you think?

Comments

  • TaprootFreak · 27 Jan 2024 · ▲ 1

    I am in favour of adding WBTC.

    I find it difficult to have an opinion on the question of conditions. I will try to add some data. Perhaps it will be helpful.

    On the credit side:
    I currently have an interest rate of 0% on my Raiffeisen account. Apparently we have got used to the fact that the bank doesn't pay us any interest on overnight deposits. With my USDT in my Metamask, I have also got used to not receiving any interest on my USD holdings.

    On the debt side:
    I have a mortgage with the following parameters:
    max 80% loan-to-value
    term of 3 years
    Saron base rate 1.692064%
    Raiffeisen surcharge 0.75%
    Effective interest rate: 2.442064%

    Bitcoin has a slightly higher volatility than the housing market. So if I get an offer from Frankencoin for 80% loan-to-value and 2.5% interest, then I think that's very attractive.

  • torginmackinga · 28 Jan 2024 · ▲ 1

    WBTC seems like a good collateral since it is very liquid.

    The limit should not be set too high (compared to the total supply of ZCHF), as there is a tail risk that the custodian fails and the coins become unbacked.