Wrapped Herculis Gold Coin — version comparison
From
Create XAUH.md
23 Sept 2026, 17:02 UTC · PaoloDiStef · 14bc276 · assessments/draft/XAUH.md
view this versionTo
Update XAUH.md
27 Sept 2026, 11:56 UTC · PaoloDiStef · 825d268 · assessments/draft/XAUH.md
view this versionStructured data (12 changes)
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Risk parameters | ||
| risk_parameters.retained_reserve | 0.2 | 0.25 |
| risk_parameters.global_minting_limit | 100000 | 250000 |
| risk_parameters.liquidation_price | 100 | 80 |
| Risk scores | ||
| risk_scores.tail_risks.counterparty_risks[0].name | Issuer, custody and redemption dependency | Herculis Group |
| risk_scores.tail_risks.smart_contract_risks[0].name | Admin-control risk | Smart-Contract Exploit |
| risk_scores.tail_risks.governance_risks[0].name | n/a | Issuer/admin-control and custody intervention risk |
| risk_scores.tail_risks.governance_risks[0].probability | n/a | Low |
| risk_scores.tail_risks.governance_risks[0].severity | n/a | Severe |
| risk_scores.tail_risks.governance_risks[0].compensation | 0% | 0.5% |
| risk_scores.tail_risks.liquidity_risks[0].name | Thin Ethereum liquidity and concentrated holder base | Secondary Market Liquidity & Minting/Redemption Impairment |
| risk_scores.tail_risks.liquidity_risks[0].probability | Medium | Low |
| risk_scores.tail_risks.liquidity_risks[0].compensation | 1.00% | 0.5% |
Narrative (markdown)
assessments/draft/{XAUH.md@14bc276 → XAUH.md@825d268}
RENAMED
|
@@ -6,26 +6,22 @@
|
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
The underlying RWA exposure is gold, which is a high-quality collateral asset with low expected market volatility.
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
-
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
## Introduction
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-
XAUH is an ERC-20 token that gives holders exposure to physical gold.
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-
The primary liquidity therefore arises from the XAUH/USDT Uniswap pool, until the listings on BTSE and Biconomy also include the Ethereum token version (currently, only TON & TRON are available).
|
| 18 |
-
|
| 19 |
## Free Float/Liquidity
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Classification: Sufficient
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-
XAUH has a
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-
At the full 100,000 ZCHF minting limit, up to 80,000 ZCHF could be withdrawn at a 20% reserve requirement.
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
## Public Information
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Classification: Strong
|
|
@@ -40,13 +36,11 @@
|
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Maximum Drawdown, 96h close-to-close: 12.00%
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-
The underlying exposure is one gram of gold. Gold is materially less volatile than most crypto-native collateral, which supports a lower ordinary market-risk reserve than would be appropriate for crypto-native assets.
|
| 46 |
-
|
| 47 |
## Tail Risks
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
-
### Counterparty Risk:
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
Description: XAUH depends on Herculis as issuer, the custody of the underlying gold, and the operational process linking the token to the physical gold.
|
| 52 |
|
|
@@ -58,9 +52,9 @@
|
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
XAUH is a tokenized wrapper whose value depends on the issuer, custody structure, reserve documentation, redemption process, and market confidence.
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
-
A failure in any of these components could impair the token relative to the underlying gold price. This risk is
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
-
### Smart Contract Risk:
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
Description: XAUH depends on an upgradeable Ethereum token contract with issuer-admin functionality.
|
| 66 |
|
|
@@ -72,20 +66,22 @@
|
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
The Ethereum token contract is an upgradeable proxy and includes administrative controls. Reviewed functionality indicates controls such as freeze, unfreeze, wipe of frozen addresses, pause, unpause, supply adjustment, supply-controller assignment, asset-protection role assignment, and fee-controller functions.
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
-
Such controls are common for centrally issued RWA tokens, but they introduce dependency on correct administration, secure key management, and predictable issuer behaviour. A contract-level issue, malicious upgrade, compromised admin key, pause, freeze, wipe, or supply-control error could impair transferability, settlement, or liquidation proceeds. A 0.
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
-
### Governance Risk:
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
-
Description:
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
-
Probability:
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
-
Severity:
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
Compensation: 0%
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
-
XAUH is centrally issued
|
| 88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 89 |
### Legal Risk: n/a
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
Description: No separate legal-risk premium is assigned in the current classification.
|
|
@@ -96,12 +92,10 @@
|
|
| 96 |
|
| 97 |
Compensation: 0%
|
| 98 |
|
| 99 |
-
Legal and
|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
-
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
-
### Liquidity Risk: Thin Ethereum liquidity and concentrated holder base
|
| 104 |
-
|
| 105 |
Description: Ethereum XAUH liquidity is limited, and the holder base currently very concentrated.
|
| 106 |
|
| 107 |
Probability: Medium
|
|
@@ -110,9 +104,9 @@
|
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
Compensation: 1.00%
|
| 112 |
|
| 113 |
-
The practical Ethereum liquidity source is currently the Uniswap pool
|
| 114 |
|
| 115 |
-
This means that a Frankencoin liquidation could face meaningful
|
| 116 |
|
| 117 |
### Contagion Risk: n/a
|
| 118 |
|
|
@@ -128,8 +122,8 @@
|
|
| 128 |
|
| 129 |
## Conclusion
|
| 130 |
|
| 131 |
-
The proposed retained reserve of
|
| 132 |
|
| 133 |
-
The target interest rate of 2.5% is justified by the selected risk premia: 1.00% for issuer, custody, and redemption dependency, 0.5% for smart-contract and admin-control risk,
|
| 134 |
|
| 135 |
-
The proposed
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
The underlying RWA exposure is gold, which is a high-quality collateral asset with low expected market volatility.
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
+
XAUH, however, is a tokenized-gold wrapper with a limited track record. Therefore, an initial global minting limit of ZCHF 250,000 and an interest rate of 2.5% are applied to contain the exposure and compensate FPS holders for the associated tail risks.
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
## Introduction
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
+
XAUH is an ERC-20 token that gives holders exposure to physical gold. Herculis describes the asset as backed by Swiss-stored, insured, and audited LBMA 999.9 gold, with regular custody attestation by KPMG Switzerland. XAUH also exists on other networks, including TON and TRON. From 500 XAUH, physical redemptions are possible for KYC-ed holders at a 3% redemption fee plus applicable transportation and insurance costs.
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
+
Herculis Tokens SA is incorporated in Panama as a subsidiary of Herculis Group, a Swiss Wealth Management & Asset Protection boutique founded in 2009, and aims to offer a more transparent and secure way for investors to participate in the gold market without the frictions typically associated with traditional gold investments.
|
| 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
## Free Float/Liquidity
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Classification: Sufficient
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
+
XAUH currently has a highly concentrated holder distribution on Ethereum: around 86% of supply is held in a single issuer-controlled address, while roughly 9% sits in the Uniswap pool. However, Herculis plans to expand Uniswap liquidity, add Ethereum XAUH support to the existing Biconomy and BTSE listings, and integrate Ethereum XAUH with its live merchant/on-ramp integrations such as ChangeNOW, Changelly and Wert. The holder distribution is expected to improve as soon as these listings and integrations are finalised.
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
+
Importantly, XAUH also has a documented primary-market minting mechanism. KYC-approved customers can request new issuance either by contributing eligible physical gold or by transferring FIAT for newly issued XAUH. The free float is therefore considered sufficient for now, and is expected to become stronger when the planned listings and integrations are finalised.
|
| 24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 25 |
## Public Information
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Classification: Strong
|
|
|
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Maximum Drawdown, 96h close-to-close: 12.00%
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
+
To account for ordinary gold-price volatility over 96h, the 2% challenger reward, and applying an additional haircut for liquidation costs and potential time delays, a 25% minter reserve appears appropriate.
|
| 40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 41 |
## Tail Risks
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
+
### Counterparty Risk: Herculis Group
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Description: XAUH depends on Herculis as issuer, the custody of the underlying gold, and the operational process linking the token to the physical gold.
|
| 46 |
|
|
|
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
XAUH is a tokenized wrapper whose value depends on the issuer, custody structure, reserve documentation, redemption process, and market confidence.
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
+
A failure in any of these components could impair the token relative to the underlying gold price. This risk is higher than for larger tokenized-gold products with longer operating histories, and the token could depeg more significantly from the underlying gold price in such a scenario. A 1.00% compensation is therefore assigned for issuer, custody, and redemption dependency.
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
+
### Smart Contract Risk: Smart-Contract Exploit
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
Description: XAUH depends on an upgradeable Ethereum token contract with issuer-admin functionality.
|
| 60 |
|
|
|
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
The Ethereum token contract is an upgradeable proxy and includes administrative controls. Reviewed functionality indicates controls such as freeze, unfreeze, wipe of frozen addresses, pause, unpause, supply adjustment, supply-controller assignment, asset-protection role assignment, and fee-controller functions.
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
+
Such controls are common for centrally issued RWA tokens, but they introduce dependency on correct administration, secure key management, and predictable issuer behaviour. A contract-level issue, malicious upgrade, compromised admin key, pause, freeze, wipe, or supply-control error could impair transferability, settlement, or liquidation proceeds. A 0.5% compensation is assigned for smart-contract risk.
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
+
### Governance Risk: Issuer/admin-control and custody intervention risk
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
+
Description: XAUH is a centrally issued tokenized commodity and thus carries issuer-admin, address-blocking, and government intervention risk.
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
+
Probability: Low
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
+
Severity: Severe
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
Compensation: 0%
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
+
XAUH is centrally issued and backed by physical gold held in custody. The token contract includes address-level blocking controls, including functions to add or remove addresses from a blocked list, check whether an address is blocked, and destroy funds held by a blocked address.
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
+
Because the underlying gold is stored physically in identifiable custody arrangements, legal, regulatory, or administrative intervention could also impair redemption, secondary-market confidence, or the economic link between XAUH and physical gold. This is captured under governance/admin-control risk for consistency with other tokenized off-chain assets. A 0.50% compensation is assigned for this residual risk.
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
### Legal Risk: n/a
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
Description: No separate legal-risk premium is assigned in the current classification.
|
|
|
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
Compensation: 0%
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
+
Legal and operational considerations are mainly captured through counterparty/custody risk and governance/admin-control risk. No additional standalone legal-risk premium is assigned to avoid double-counting.
|
| 96 |
|
| 97 |
+
### Liquidity Risk: Secondary Market Liquidity & Minting/Redemption Impairment
|
| 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 99 |
Description: Ethereum XAUH liquidity is limited, and the holder base currently very concentrated.
|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
Probability: Medium
|
|
|
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
Compensation: 1.00%
|
| 106 |
|
| 107 |
+
The practical Ethereum liquidity source is currently the Uniswap pool as well as the direct minting/redemption path.
|
| 108 |
|
| 109 |
+
This means that a Frankencoin liquidation could face a meaningful discount, as arbitrageurs would apply a haircut due to the limited possibility to sell the tokens on Uniswaps and additional costs for primary market redemptions. A 1.00% compensation is assigned for liquidity risk.
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
### Contagion Risk: n/a
|
| 112 |
|
|
|
|
| 122 |
|
| 123 |
## Conclusion
|
| 124 |
|
| 125 |
+
The proposed retained reserve of 25% is appropriate relative to expected market volatilty of the underlying gold exposure, and leaves a substantial buffer for liquidation execution. It should not be interpreted as protection against issuer, custody, redemption, admin-control, or liquidity tail risks. Those risks are addressed primarily through the proposed 250,000 ZCHF global minting limit and the 2.5% target interest rate.
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 |
+
The target interest rate of 2.5% is justified by the selected risk premia: 1.00% for issuer, custody, and redemption dependency, 0.5% for smart-contract and admin-control risk, 0.5% for governance risks, and 0.5% for liquidity risk as described.
|
| 128 |
|
| 129 |
+
The proposed 250,000 ZCHF global minting limit is the primary safeguard as long as the free float and liquidity of the token are limited. The issuer has however indicated plans of growing the Ethereum version with additional integrations and CEX listings. A higher global minting limit should then be possible.
|
assessments/draft/{XAUH.md@14bc276 → XAUH.md@825d268}
RENAMED
|
@@ -6,26 +6,22 @@
|
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
7
|
The underlying RWA exposure is gold, which is a high-quality collateral asset with low expected market volatility.
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
9
|
+
XAUH, however, is a tokenized-gold wrapper with a limited track record. Therefore, an initial global minting limit of ZCHF 250,000 and an interest rate of 2.5% are applied to contain the exposure and compensate FPS holders for the associated tail risks.
|
|
10
10
|
|
|
11
11
|
## Introduction
|
|
12
12
|
|
|
13
|
-
XAUH is an ERC-20 token that gives holders exposure to physical gold.
|
|
13
|
+
XAUH is an ERC-20 token that gives holders exposure to physical gold. Herculis describes the asset as backed by Swiss-stored, insured, and audited LBMA 999.9 gold, with regular custody attestation by KPMG Switzerland. XAUH also exists on other networks, including TON and TRON. From 500 XAUH, physical redemptions are possible for KYC-ed holders at a 3% redemption fee plus applicable transportation and insurance costs.
|
|
14
14
|
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
15
|
+
Herculis Tokens SA is incorporated in Panama as a subsidiary of Herculis Group, a Swiss Wealth Management & Asset Protection boutique founded in 2009, and aims to offer a more transparent and secure way for investors to participate in the gold market without the frictions typically associated with traditional gold investments.
|
|
16
16
|
|
|
17
|
-
The primary liquidity therefore arises from the XAUH/USDT Uniswap pool, until the listings on BTSE and Biconomy also include the Ethereum token version (currently, only TON & TRON are available).
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
17
|
## Free Float/Liquidity
|
|
20
18
|
|
|
21
19
|
Classification: Sufficient
|
|
22
20
|
|
|
23
|
-
XAUH has a
|
|
21
|
+
XAUH currently has a highly concentrated holder distribution on Ethereum: around 86% of supply is held in a single issuer-controlled address, while roughly 9% sits in the Uniswap pool. However, Herculis plans to expand Uniswap liquidity, add Ethereum XAUH support to the existing Biconomy and BTSE listings, and integrate Ethereum XAUH with its live merchant/on-ramp integrations such as ChangeNOW, Changelly and Wert. The holder distribution is expected to improve as soon as these listings and integrations are finalised.
|
|
24
22
|
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
23
|
+
Importantly, XAUH also has a documented primary-market minting mechanism. KYC-approved customers can request new issuance either by contributing eligible physical gold or by transferring FIAT for newly issued XAUH. The free float is therefore considered sufficient for now, and is expected to become stronger when the planned listings and integrations are finalised.
|
|
26
24
|
|
|
27
|
-
At the full 100,000 ZCHF minting limit, up to 80,000 ZCHF could be withdrawn at a 20% reserve requirement.
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
25
|
## Public Information
|
|
30
26
|
|
|
31
27
|
Classification: Strong
|
|
@@ -40,13 +36,11 @@
|
|
|
40
36
|
|
|
41
37
|
Maximum Drawdown, 96h close-to-close: 12.00%
|
|
42
38
|
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
39
|
+
To account for ordinary gold-price volatility over 96h, the 2% challenger reward, and applying an additional haircut for liquidation costs and potential time delays, a 25% minter reserve appears appropriate.
|
|
44
40
|
|
|
45
|
-
The underlying exposure is one gram of gold. Gold is materially less volatile than most crypto-native collateral, which supports a lower ordinary market-risk reserve than would be appropriate for crypto-native assets.
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
41
|
## Tail Risks
|
|
48
42
|
|
|
49
|
-
### Counterparty Risk:
|
|
43
|
+
### Counterparty Risk: Herculis Group
|
|
50
44
|
|
|
51
45
|
Description: XAUH depends on Herculis as issuer, the custody of the underlying gold, and the operational process linking the token to the physical gold.
|
|
52
46
|
|
|
@@ -58,9 +52,9 @@
|
|
|
58
52
|
|
|
59
53
|
XAUH is a tokenized wrapper whose value depends on the issuer, custody structure, reserve documentation, redemption process, and market confidence.
|
|
60
54
|
|
|
61
|
-
A failure in any of these components could impair the token relative to the underlying gold price. This risk is
|
|
55
|
+
A failure in any of these components could impair the token relative to the underlying gold price. This risk is higher than for larger tokenized-gold products with longer operating histories, and the token could depeg more significantly from the underlying gold price in such a scenario. A 1.00% compensation is therefore assigned for issuer, custody, and redemption dependency.
|
|
62
56
|
|
|
63
|
-
### Smart Contract Risk:
|
|
57
|
+
### Smart Contract Risk: Smart-Contract Exploit
|
|
64
58
|
|
|
65
59
|
Description: XAUH depends on an upgradeable Ethereum token contract with issuer-admin functionality.
|
|
66
60
|
|
|
@@ -72,20 +66,22 @@
|
|
|
72
66
|
|
|
73
67
|
The Ethereum token contract is an upgradeable proxy and includes administrative controls. Reviewed functionality indicates controls such as freeze, unfreeze, wipe of frozen addresses, pause, unpause, supply adjustment, supply-controller assignment, asset-protection role assignment, and fee-controller functions.
|
|
74
68
|
|
|
75
|
-
Such controls are common for centrally issued RWA tokens, but they introduce dependency on correct administration, secure key management, and predictable issuer behaviour. A contract-level issue, malicious upgrade, compromised admin key, pause, freeze, wipe, or supply-control error could impair transferability, settlement, or liquidation proceeds. A 0.
|
|
69
|
+
Such controls are common for centrally issued RWA tokens, but they introduce dependency on correct administration, secure key management, and predictable issuer behaviour. A contract-level issue, malicious upgrade, compromised admin key, pause, freeze, wipe, or supply-control error could impair transferability, settlement, or liquidation proceeds. A 0.5% compensation is assigned for smart-contract risk.
|
|
76
70
|
|
|
77
|
-
### Governance Risk:
|
|
71
|
+
### Governance Risk: Issuer/admin-control and custody intervention risk
|
|
78
72
|
|
|
79
|
-
Description:
|
|
73
|
+
Description: XAUH is a centrally issued tokenized commodity and thus carries issuer-admin, address-blocking, and government intervention risk.
|
|
80
74
|
|
|
81
|
-
Probability:
|
|
75
|
+
Probability: Low
|
|
82
76
|
|
|
83
|
-
Severity:
|
|
77
|
+
Severity: Severe
|
|
84
78
|
|
|
85
79
|
Compensation: 0%
|
|
86
80
|
|
|
87
|
-
XAUH is centrally issued
|
|
81
|
+
XAUH is centrally issued and backed by physical gold held in custody. The token contract includes address-level blocking controls, including functions to add or remove addresses from a blocked list, check whether an address is blocked, and destroy funds held by a blocked address.
|
|
88
82
|
|
|
83
|
+
Because the underlying gold is stored physically in identifiable custody arrangements, legal, regulatory, or administrative intervention could also impair redemption, secondary-market confidence, or the economic link between XAUH and physical gold. This is captured under governance/admin-control risk for consistency with other tokenized off-chain assets. A 0.50% compensation is assigned for this residual risk.
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
89
85
|
### Legal Risk: n/a
|
|
90
86
|
|
|
91
87
|
Description: No separate legal-risk premium is assigned in the current classification.
|
|
@@ -96,12 +92,10 @@
|
|
|
96
92
|
|
|
97
93
|
Compensation: 0%
|
|
98
94
|
|
|
99
|
-
Legal and
|
|
95
|
+
Legal and operational considerations are mainly captured through counterparty/custody risk and governance/admin-control risk. No additional standalone legal-risk premium is assigned to avoid double-counting.
|
|
100
96
|
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
97
|
+
### Liquidity Risk: Secondary Market Liquidity & Minting/Redemption Impairment
|
|
102
98
|
|
|
103
|
-
### Liquidity Risk: Thin Ethereum liquidity and concentrated holder base
|
|
104
|
-
|
|
105
99
|
Description: Ethereum XAUH liquidity is limited, and the holder base currently very concentrated.
|
|
106
100
|
|
|
107
101
|
Probability: Medium
|
|
@@ -110,9 +104,9 @@
|
|
|
110
104
|
|
|
111
105
|
Compensation: 1.00%
|
|
112
106
|
|
|
113
|
-
The practical Ethereum liquidity source is currently the Uniswap pool
|
|
107
|
+
The practical Ethereum liquidity source is currently the Uniswap pool as well as the direct minting/redemption path.
|
|
114
108
|
|
|
115
|
-
This means that a Frankencoin liquidation could face meaningful
|
|
109
|
+
This means that a Frankencoin liquidation could face a meaningful discount, as arbitrageurs would apply a haircut due to the limited possibility to sell the tokens on Uniswaps and additional costs for primary market redemptions. A 1.00% compensation is assigned for liquidity risk.
|
|
116
110
|
|
|
117
111
|
### Contagion Risk: n/a
|
|
118
112
|
|
|
@@ -128,8 +122,8 @@
|
|
|
128
122
|
|
|
129
123
|
## Conclusion
|
|
130
124
|
|
|
131
|
-
The proposed retained reserve of
|
|
125
|
+
The proposed retained reserve of 25% is appropriate relative to expected market volatilty of the underlying gold exposure, and leaves a substantial buffer for liquidation execution. It should not be interpreted as protection against issuer, custody, redemption, admin-control, or liquidity tail risks. Those risks are addressed primarily through the proposed 250,000 ZCHF global minting limit and the 2.5% target interest rate.
|
|
132
126
|
|
|
133
|
-
The target interest rate of 2.5% is justified by the selected risk premia: 1.00% for issuer, custody, and redemption dependency, 0.5% for smart-contract and admin-control risk,
|
|
127
|
+
The target interest rate of 2.5% is justified by the selected risk premia: 1.00% for issuer, custody, and redemption dependency, 0.5% for smart-contract and admin-control risk, 0.5% for governance risks, and 0.5% for liquidity risk as described.
|
|
134
128
|
|
|
135
|
-
The proposed
|
|
129
|
+
The proposed 250,000 ZCHF global minting limit is the primary safeguard as long as the free float and liquidity of the token are limited. The issuer has however indicated plans of growing the Ethereum version with additional integrations and CEX listings. A higher global minting limit should then be possible.
|
